<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title> <atom:link href="http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/</link> <description>Straight from the mind of geniuseseses....</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/comment-page-1/#comment-12405</link> <dc:creator>gman freeman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/#comment-12405</guid> <description>thanks a lot Gerrod... that exactly what I was looking for</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks a lot Gerrod&#8230; that exactly what I was looking for</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/comment-page-1/#comment-11907</link> <dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:10:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/#comment-11907</guid> <description>There is a performance penalty with a dynamic resource. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613559.aspxNot sure if anybody has done any real world analysis. Maybe check out Tim Cahill&#039;s WPF Performance blog?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a performance penalty with a dynamic resource.<br /> <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613559.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613559.aspx</a></p><p>Not sure if anybody has done any real world analysis. Maybe check out Tim Cahill&#8217;s WPF Performance blog?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/comment-page-1/#comment-11899</link> <dc:creator>stu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/#comment-11899</guid> <description>Are there any performance tests out there between static and dynamic resources?  I&#039;d love to see some metrics.Many designer problems in VS and blend just go away when I use dynamic resources, but I&#039;m concerned about performance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any performance tests out there between static and dynamic resources?  I&#8217;d love to see some metrics.</p><p>Many designer problems in VS and blend just go away when I use dynamic resources, but I&#8217;m concerned about performance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/comment-page-1/#comment-8732</link> <dc:creator>Asim Sajjad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:01:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/#comment-8732</guid> <description>Thanks for nice short article , It really help me to distinguish betwee the static and dynamic resource</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for nice short article , It really help me to distinguish betwee the static and dynamic resource</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Dispermox (Amoxicillin) For Sale</title><link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link> <dc:creator>lelt lelt tun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:19:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/06/17/staticresource-vs-dynamicresource/#comment-1900</guid> <description>Thanks a lot for your explain about StaticResource vs DynamicResource.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your explain about StaticResource vs DynamicResource.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: quickduck.com @ 2012-05-20 13:16:28 -->
