Comments on: Daily question: Fun with constructors http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/ Straight from the mind of geniuseseses.... Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:40:27 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Shafeer http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/comment-page-1/#comment-8337 Shafeer Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:47:50 +0000 http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/#comment-8337 Base with value: Derived value Derived with value: Derived value Derived: Empty Base with value: Derived value
Derived with value: Derived value
Derived: Empty

]]> By: Gerrod http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/comment-page-1/#comment-966 Gerrod Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:13 +0000 http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/#comment-966 Nope, you're absolutely right Bender. Good one; it was a bit of a trick question! Nope, you’re absolutely right Bender. Good one; it was a bit of a trick question!

]]> By: Ben http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/comment-page-1/#comment-964 Ben Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:04:18 +0000 http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/07/10/daily-question-fun-with-constructors/#comment-964 I just wish I had a compiler :) Also, what version of Coldfusion are you using? There's no such thing as a constructor in MX 6.1? I'm guessing this: Base with value: Derived value Derived with value: Derived value Derived: Empty But am happy to concede that the execution order for : this(..) is different to : base(...) and thus could be wrong. I just wish I had a compiler :)

Also, what version of Coldfusion are you using? There’s no such thing as a constructor in MX 6.1?

I’m guessing this:

Base with value: Derived value
Derived with value: Derived value
Derived: Empty

But am happy to concede that the execution order for : this(..) is different to : base(…) and thus could be wrong.

]]>