<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SqlDependency and DateTime values</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/</link>
	<description>Straight from the mind of geniuseseses....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:40:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerrod</title>
		<link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>gerrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I take your point, but I don&#039;t necessarily agree.

1) This was for an internal application, so not only is everyone&#039;s access logged, but I&#039;d find it difficult to believe that someone inside the company would maliciously attack the software; but even so -

2) The date/time parameter in this instance was never supplied by a user; it was always a generated parameter (in fact, it was always &quot;DateTime.Today&quot;).

Still, I agree that using parameters is always the best option; it&#039;s just that in this instance, I didn&#039;t think it would work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I take your point, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree.</p>
<p>1) This was for an internal application, so not only is everyone&#8217;s access logged, but I&#8217;d find it difficult to believe that someone inside the company would maliciously attack the software; but even so -</p>
<p>2) The date/time parameter in this instance was never supplied by a user; it was always a generated parameter (in fact, it was always &#8220;DateTime.Today&#8221;).</p>
<p>Still, I agree that using parameters is always the best option; it&#8217;s just that in this instance, I didn&#8217;t think it would work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>You should &lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; use SqlParams and &lt;b&gt;never ever&lt;/b&gt; approach a problem like your initial suggestion as this opens you application up to SQL Injection Attacks. 

Something you want to avoid at all costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should <b>always</b> use SqlParams and <b>never ever</b> approach a problem like your initial suggestion as this opens you application up to SQL Injection Attacks. </p>
<p>Something you want to avoid at all costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viiviiviivii</title>
		<link>http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>viiviiviivii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quickduck.com/blog/2008/09/22/sqldependency-and-datetime-values/#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>I start coding at VF on Monday (first time in 4 months), so, I thought I&#039;d check up on what you Quick Duckers were up to!

Good to see you are still doin stuff..

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I start coding at VF on Monday (first time in 4 months), so, I thought I&#8217;d check up on what you Quick Duckers were up to!</p>
<p>Good to see you are still doin stuff..</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
